Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby - Nick Carraway, Detached or Dishonest? :: Great Gatsby Essays

The great Gatsby  nick - Detached or Dishonest?   The Great Gatsby is a difficult book to interpret, particularly because of the style in which it is written. non only must the reader differentiate between the separate views of nick as the narrator and prick as the use, exclusively he or she must also take into consideration at what time period, proportional to this story, ar these views being expressed. After all, Nick the narrator is presently evaluating the mood in which his character behaved the year before, as well as allowing his character to voice his opinion, as his opinion had been during that time frame. We learn to trust Nick as a narrator, because all the pieces of information he gives to us, received by means of symbolism, imagery, or personal reflection, lead us to make signifi fecal mattert decisions regarding the different characters of the novel. His character, on the other hand, cannot be looked upon in the same manner it can be seen as dishones t and hypocritical, yet it is these negative characteristics that humanize him, allowing readers to associate to him as a person.   What Nick thinks as the narrator is not ever so the same as what his character portrays. In just the third carve up of this book, we learn that Nick is inclined to reserve all judgments (Page 5), but that his tolerance, has a limit (Page 6). True, his opinions might not be expressed in words, but it is important to realize that those opinions still exist. The narrators role is to make us alert of Nicks judgments, for his character neglects to respond to such feelings. Various techniques allow us to seduce our own conclusions, the most interesting one being symbolism. The choke remains mentioned throughout the novel serves to corrupt everything it encounters. It is this foul form that represents the lives of Daisy, Tom, and Jordan. After all, they are all immoral characters. A word such as dust successfully gives off a negative ambiance, but for Nick to go the step further and declare such dust to be foul truly represents his disapproval of their actions. Thus, without proclaiming his opinion in the form of words, Nick presents it openly through symbolism for us to see. However, even though we know that Nick as the narrator, reflecting back on that summer, did not see the three to be honorable people, he still spent a great bundle of time with them.